4.7 Article

Study of the influence of pressure on enhanced gaseous hydrocarbon yield under high pressure-high temperature coal pyrolysis

Journal

FUEL
Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages 3590-3597

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.06.007

Keywords

Coal; Pyrolysis; Gaseous hydrocarbon; Pressure; Stable isotope

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [kzcx2-yw-114]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry [SKLOG2008A01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of pressure on the yield of gaseous hydrocarbon products derived from pyrolysis of Fushun and Xianfeng coals have been investigated in an anhydrous and confined system. Pyrolysis was performed in sealed gold tubes at 380 degrees C and under the pressures ranging from 50 to 250 MPa for 24 h. The results show that the effect of pressure on coal pyrolysis and product generation should not be ignored. For the Fushun and Xianfeng lignite, the yields of gaseous hydrocarbon generation increase by 9.1% and 12.7% when the pressure increases from 50 to 250 MPa, respectively. However, the yields of hydrogen gas decrease greatly with pressure. The hydrogen gas yields of Fushun and Xianfeng lignite decrease by 76.5% and 75.9%, respectively, when the pressure increases from 50 to 250 MPa. Yields of carbon dioxide gas of Fushun and Xianfeng coals were enhanced with increasing pressure by 7.4% and 8.9% respectively. Data of stable carbon isotope compositions reveal that the methane and ethane carbon isotope values are also affected by pressure, as they become heavier by approximately 1.2% (PDB) when the pressure is increased from 50 to 250 MPa. Simultaneously, the hydrogen isotope compositions of methane and ethane increase by 10.3% and 7.1%, respectively. Our experimental results suggest that the increase in gaseous hydrocarbon yield is resulted from synthesis of carbon dioxide and hydrogen and pressure serves to facilitate the synthetic process. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available