4.7 Article

A kinetic study of gaseous potassium capture by coal minerals in a high temperature fixed-bed reactor

Journal

FUEL
Volume 87, Issue 15-16, Pages 3304-3312

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.05.003

Keywords

potassium vapor capture; coal minerals; kinetics; coal/straw co-firing

Funding

  1. PSO Eltra [4766]
  2. CHEC (Combustion and Harmful Emission Control)
  3. Technical University of Denmark
  4. Danish Technical Research Council
  5. European Union
  6. Nordic Energy Research
  7. Dong Energy A/S
  8. Vattenfall A.B.
  9. FLSmidth A/S
  10. Energinet.dk
  11. Danish Energy Research program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reactions between gaseous potassium chloride and coal minerals were investigated in a lab-scale high temperature fixed-bed reactor using single sorbent pellets. The applied coal minerals included kaolin, mullite, silica, alumina, bituminous coal ash, and lignite coal ash that were formed into long cylindrical pellets. Kaolin and bituminous coal ash that both have significant amounts of Si and Al show superior potassium capture characteristics. Experimental results show that capture of potassium by kaolin is independent of the gas oxygen content. Kaolin releases water and forms metakaolin when heated at temperatures above 450 degrees C. The amounts of potassium captured by metakaolin pellet decreases with increasing reaction temperature in the range of 900-1300 degrees C and increases again with further increasing the temperature up to 1500 degrees C. There is no reaction of pre-made mullite with KCl at temperatures below 1300 degrees C. However, the weight gain by mullite is only slightly smaller than that by kaolin in the temperature range of 1300-1500 degrees C. A simple model was developed for the gas-solid reaction between potassium vapor and metakaolin pellet at 900 degrees C. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available