4.5 Article

The nasty neighbour in the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) steals paternity and elicits aggression

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-19

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Tourism, Environment and Conservation of the Northern Cape
  2. Goegap Nature Reserve
  3. Julius Klaus-Stiftung Zurich (Switzerland)
  4. Holcim Foundation (Switzerland)
  5. Vontobel Foundation (Switzerland)
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-120194]
  7. Claude Leon Foundation (South Africa)
  8. University of the Witwatersrand
  9. University of Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Territoriality functions to monopolize access to resources including mates, but is costly in terms of energy and time investment. Some species reduce these costs by being less aggressive towards their neighbours than towards unfamiliar strangers, the so called dear enemy phenomenon. However, in other species individuals are more, not less aggressive towards their neighbours. It has been hypothesised that this is due to the fact that neighbours can impose a greater threat than strangers, but this has not been tested previously. Results: We tested aggression in wild group-living male striped mice in a neutral test arena and demonstrate that breeders are more aggressive than non-breeding philopatrics, and that more aggression occurs during the breeding than during the non-breeding season. Male breeders were significantly more aggressive towards their neighbours than towards strangers, leading to the prediction that neighbours are the most important competitors for paternity. Using a molecular parentage analysis we show that 28% of offspring are sired by neighbouring males and only 7% by strangers. Conclusions: We conclude that in male striped mice the main function of male aggression is defending paternity against their territorial neighbours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available