4.5 Article

Caffeine-induced global reductions in resting-state BOLD connectivity reflect widespread decreases in MEG connectivity

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00063

Keywords

magnetoencephalography; fMRI; BOLD; resting-state; functional connectivity; caffeine

Funding

  1. NIH [R01NS051661, R21MH096495]
  2. ONR MURI [N00014-10-1-0072]
  3. VA [NURC-022-10F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the temporal correlation between spontaneous fluctuations of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal from different brain regions is used to assess functional connectivity. However, because the BOLD signal is an indirect measure of neuronal activity, its complex hemodynamic nature can complicate the interpretation of differences in connectivity that are observed across conditions or subjects. For example, prior studies have shown that caffeine leads to wide spread reductions in BOLD connectivity but were not able to determine if neural or vascular factors were primarily responsible for the observed decrease. In this study, we used source localized magnetoencephalography (MEG) inconjunction with fMRI to further examine the origins of the caffeine induced changes in BOLD connectivity. We observed wide spread and significant (p<0.01) reductions in both MEG and fMRI connectivity measures, suggesting that decreases in the connectivity of resting-state neuro-electric power fluctuations were primarily responsible for the observed BOLD connectivity changes. The MEG connectivity decreases were most pronounced in the beta band. By demonstrating the similarity in MEG and fMRI based connectivity changes, these results provide evidence for the neural basis of resting-state fMRI networks and further support the potential of MEG as a tool to characterize resting-state connectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available