4.5 Review

Neural correlates of the age-related changes in motor sequence learning and motor adaptation in older adults

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00142

Keywords

aging; motor learning; consolidation; adaptation; procedural memory; neuroimaging; striatum; cerebellum

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-97830]
  2. Ministere du Developpement, de l'innovation et de l'exportation (MDEIE) [PSR-SIIRI-704]
  3. European Commission-ERA Net Neuron [26659]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  5. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ)
  6. Fyssen Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the world's population ages, a deeper understanding of the relationship between aging and motor learning will become increasingly relevant in basic research and applied settings. In this context, this review aims to address the effects of age on motor sequence learning (MSL) and motor adaptation (MA) with respect to behavioral, neurological, and neuroimaging findings. Previous behavioral research investigating the influence of aging on motor learning has consistently reported the following results. First, the initial acquisition of motor sequences is not altered, except under conditions of increased task complexity. Second, older adults demonstrate deficits in motor sequence memory consolidation. And, third, although older adults demonstrate deficits during the exposure phase of MA paradigms, the aftereffects following removal of the sensorimotor perturbation are similar to young adults, suggesting that the adaptive ability of older adults is relatively intact. This paper will review the potential neural underpinnings of these behavioral results, with a particular emphasis on the influence of age-related dysfunctions in the cortico-striatal system on motor learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available