4.5 Article

Prediction of brain-computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00105

Keywords

BCI; motorimagery; aptitude; DTI; fractional anisotropy

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BI 195/58-1]
  2. BMBF [SFB 550/B5, C6]
  3. Bernstein Center for Neurocomputation [01GQ0831]
  4. European Research Council [ERC 227632-BCCI]
  5. European ICT Programm Project [FP7-288566]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Brain-computer interface (BCI) provide a non-muscular communication channel for patients with impairments of the motor system. A significant number of BCI users is unable to obtain voluntary control of a BCI-system in proper time. This makes methods that can be used to determine the aptitude of a user necessary. Methods: We hypothesized that integrity and connectivity of involved white matter connections may serve as a predictor of individual BCI-performance. Therefore, we analyzed structural data from anatomical scans and DTI of motor imagery BCI-users differentiated into high and low BCI-aptitude groups based on their over all performance. Results: Using a machine learning classification method we identified discriminating structural brain trait features and correlated the best features with a continuous measure of individual BCI-performance. Prediction of the aptitude group of each participant was possible withn ear perfect accuracy (one error). Conclusions: Tissue volumetric analysis yielded only poor classification results. In contrast, the structural integrity and my elination quality of deep white matter structures such as the Corpus Callosum, Cingulum, and Superior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle were positively correlated with individual BCI performance. Significance: This confirms that structural brain traits contribute to individual performance in BCI use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available