4.7 Article

Improving the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology by expanding measures of success

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 39-47

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/120370

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MacroSystems Biology Program, in the Emerging Frontiers Division of the Biological Sciences Directorate at NSF
  2. NSF [EF1065656, EF1137327, EF1065255, EF1065986, EF1065864, EF1064998, EF1138160]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1065753] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1029808] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Emerging Frontiers [1065753] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Emerging Frontiers
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1064998, 1065853, 1065824, 1065826, 1065702] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Emerging Frontiers
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1065786, 1065255, 1258503, 1065864] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to understand ecological systems at scales critical to human decision making. Current reward structures are problematic for scientists engaged in interdisciplinary research, particularly early career researchers, because academic culture tends to value only some research outputs, such as primary-authored publications. Here, we present a framework for the costs and benefits of collaboration, with a focus on early career stages, and show how the implementation of novel measures of success can help defray the costs of collaboration. Success measures at team and individual levels include research outputs other than publications, including educational outcomes, dataset creation, outreach products (eg blogs or social media), and the application of scientific results to policy or management activities. Promotion and adoption of new measures of success will require concerted effort by both collaborators and their institutions. Expanded measures should better reflect and reward the important work of both disciplinary and interdisciplinary teams at all career stages, and help sustain and stimulate a collaborative culture within ecology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available