4.7 Review

Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 174-182

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/090179

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-00-72909]
  2. University of California Santa Barbara
  3. State of California
  4. Office of Science (Biological and Environmenta Research) of the US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE FG02-04ER63911]
  5. DOE's National Institute for Climate Change [DE1 0717191]
  6. NSF [ATM 0628353]
  7. University of California, Irvine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forestry - including afforestation (the planting of trees on land where they have not recently existed), reforesta tion, avoided deforestation, and forest management - can lead to increased sequestration of atmospheric carbor dioxide and has therefore been proposed as a strategy to mitigate climate change. However, forestry also influ ences land-surface properties, including albedo (the fraction of incident sunlight reflected back to space), surface roughness, and evapotranspiration, all of which affect the amount and forms of energy transfer to the atmos phere. In some circumstances, these biophysical feedbacks can result in local climate warming, thereby counter acting the effects of carbon sequestration on global mean temperature and reducing or eliminating the net value of climate-change mitigation projects. Here, we review published and emerging research that suggests ways ir which forestry projects can counteract the consequences associated with biophysical interactions, and highligh knowledge gaps in managing forests for climate protection. We also outline several ways in which biophysica effects can be incorporated into frameworks that use the maintenance of forests as a climate protection strategy

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available