4.5 Article

EpCAM expression in normal, non-pathological tissues

Journal

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 3096-3100

Publisher

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/2911

Keywords

EpCAM; CD326; liver; progenitor; stem cell; hepatoblast; hepatocyte; review

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK052851] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [R01AA014243] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA014243] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 IP30-DK065933, R01 DK52851] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is associated with various cancers. Most normal, non-pathological epithelial tissue is EpCAM positive with the exception of epidermal keratinocytes, gastric parietal cells, myoepithelial cells, thymic cortical epithelial, and hepatocytes. However, during early liver development EpCAM expression is also observed. In our studies, we have demonstrated that EpCAM is expressed in non-pathological human livers on hepatic progenitors in livers of all donor ages, from 16 weeks gestation fetal livers to adult. Hepatic progenitors of the liver consist of the stem cells and their descendants, the hepatoblasts, that give rise to the hepatocytic and biliary lineages. Both hepatic stem cells and most hepatoblasts express EpCAM, but only hepatoblasts are alpha-fetoprotein positive. The percentage of EpCAM positive progenitors in human livers varies with donor age and is about 2.5% in the adult and 12.1% in fetuses. In vivo, hepatic stem cells have been found associated with the canals of Hering. Xeno-transplantation experiments with EpCAM positive human liver cells have revealed their potential for proliferation and differentiation to mature liver parenchymal cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available