4.6 Article

Phenotypic plasticity in the spawning traits of bigheaded carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) in novel ecosystems

Journal

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 1029-1037

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12106

Keywords

Asian carp; bigheaded carp; Hypophthalmichthys; invasive cyprinid; phenotypic plasticity

Funding

  1. Indiana Department of Natural Resources
  2. US Fish and Wildlife Service
  3. USEPA's Great Lakes Restoration Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1.Bigheaded carp, including both silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H.nobilis) carp, are successful invasive fishes that threaten global freshwater biodiversity. High phenotypic plasticity probably contributes to their success in novel ecosystems, although evidence of plasticity in several spawning traits has hitherto been largely anecdotal or speculative. 2.We collected drifting eggs from a Midwestern U.S.A. river from June to September 2011 and from April to June 2012 to investigate the spawning traits of bigheaded carp in novel ecosystems. 3.Unlike reports from the native range, the presence of drifting bigheaded carp eggs was not related to changes in hydrological regime or mean daily water temperature. Bigheaded carp also exhibited protracted spawning, since we found drifting eggs throughout the summer and as late as 1 September 2011. Finally, we detected bigheaded carp eggs in a river reach where the channel is c. 30m wide with a catchment area of 4579km2, the smallest stream in which spawning has yet been documented. 4.Taken with previous observations of spawning traits that depart from those observed within the native ranges of both bighead and silver carp, our findings provide direct evidence that bigheaded carp exhibit plastic spawning traits in novel ecosystems that may facilitate invasion and establishment in a wider range of river conditions than previously envisaged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available