4.6 Article

Differences in feeding behaviour among Chironomus species revealed by measurements of sulphur stable isotopes and cadmium in larvae

Journal

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 73-86

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12247

Keywords

cadmium; Chironomus species; feeding behaviour; lakes; stable isotopes

Funding

  1. Metals In the Human Environment-Strategic Network
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. We set out to determine the feeding behaviours of 15 Chironomus species collected from 16 boreal forest lakes by measuring cadmium (Cd) and stable isotopes of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) in larvae. 2. Measurements of S stable isotopes and Cd discriminated between Chironomus species that feed mainly on oxic particles from those that feed mainly on anoxic particles. Our results suggest that C. dilutus, C. entis, C. plumosus and C. staegeri feed mainly on oxic particles (in the water column, in sediment or both), whereas C. anthracinus, C. bifurcatus, C. cucini, C. decorus-group sp. 2, C. harpi, C. nr. atroviridis (sp. 2i), C. ochreatus, C. spp. NAI-NAIII and C. 'tigris' feed mainly on anoxic sediments. 3. In our study lakes, larval C isotopic signatures were relatively high, which suggests that they feed little on methanotrophic bacteria. Although larval C and N signatures differed between some sympatric Chironomus species, these differences were not consistent among lakes. The absence of a trend among lakes suggests that lake-specific factors determine larval C and N signatures. 4. Differences in feeding habits and Cd concentrations among sympatric (cohabiting) Chironomus species suggest that pooling them in ecological, palaeolimnological or ecotoxicological studies could obscure trends in nature, thereby limiting their use as monitors of climate change or pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available