4.6 Article

The non-indigenous diatom Didymosphenia geminata alters benthic communities in New Zealand rivers

Journal

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 9, Pages 1990-2002

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02247.x

Keywords

benthic invertebrates; community homogenisation; Didymosphenia geminata; invasion; periphyton

Funding

  1. Meridian Energy Ltd
  2. MAF Biosecurity New Zealand
  3. New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology [C01X0308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>1. Blooms of the benthic, stalked diatom Didymosphenia geminata were first observed in New Zealand in 2004. Since then, D. geminata has spread to numerous catchments in the South Island and is also spreading in its native range. The species is a rare example of an invasive alga in lotic systems. 2. Ecosystem effects may be expected as D. geminata attains unusually high biomass in rivers. We examined data from three independent studies in three South Island, New Zealand, rivers for evidence of effects on periphyton biomass and benthic invertebrate communities. 3. The combined results confirmed that the presence of D. geminata was associated with greatly increased periphyton biomass and, in most cases, increased invertebrate densities. We also recorded shifts in community composition, dominated by increased densities of Oligochaeta. Chironomidae, Cladocera and Nematoda also generally increased in density with D. geminata. Significant increases or declines in other invertebrate taxa were inconsistent among rivers. 4. In all three studies, increased spatial invertebrate community homogeneity was associated with high D. geminata biomass at the within-river scale. However, no declines in taxon richness or diversity were detected. 5. Although ecosystem effects of D. geminata on existing periphyton biomass and invertebrate communities are measurable, no inferences can be made from the present data about effects on higher trophic levels (fish).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available