4.3 Article

Importance of mitochondrial dysfunction in oxidative stress response: A comparative study of gene expression profiles

Journal

FREE RADICAL RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 672-680

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2011.564169

Keywords

H(2)O(2); pseudo rho 0 cell; DNA microarray; MMPs; NMuMG cell

Funding

  1. Ministry for Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [21570205]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21570205] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondria are considered to play an important role in oxidative stress response since they are a source of reactive oxygen species and are also targeted by these species. This study examined the mitochondrial conditions in cells of epithelial origin that were exposed to H(2)O(2) and found a decline in the membrane potential along with a specific loss of UQCRC1, a sub-unit of complex III, suggesting that mitochondrial dysfunction occurs upon exposure to oxidative stress. This observation led to the hypothesis that certain cellular responses to oxidative stress occurred because of mitochondrial dysfunction. When mitochondria-less (pseudo rho 0) cells were examined as a model of mitochondrial dysfunction, striking similarities were found in their cellular responses compared with those found in cells exposed to oxidative stress, including changes in gene expression and gelatinolytic enzyme activities, thus suggesting that cellular responses to oxidative stress were partly mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction. This possibility was further validated by microarray analysis, which suggested that almost one-fourth of the cellular responses to oxidative stress were mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction that accompanies oxidative stress, thereby warranting a therapeutic strategy that targets mitochondria for the treatment of oxidative stress-associated diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available