4.7 Article

HCC cells with high levels of Bcl-2 are resistant to ABT-737 via activation of the ROS-JNK-autophagy pathway

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 194-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.02.012

Keywords

HCC; ABT-737; Bcl-2; Autophagy; Apoptosis; ROS; JNK; Free radicals

Funding

  1. Chongqing Natural Science Foundation [cstc2011BB5030, 2013jjB10015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201068, 81273226, 81228005]
  3. Scientific Funds of the Third Military Medical University [2011XHG02, 2012XZH01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-737 has shown promising antitumor efficacy in vivo and in vitro. However, some reports have demonstrated that HCC cells are resistant to ABT-737, and the corresponding molecular mechanisms of this resistance are not well known. In this study, we found that HCC cells with high levels of Bcl-2 were markedly resistant to ABT-737 compared to HCC cells with low levels of Bcl-2. In HCC cells with high levels of Bcl-2 (such as HepG2 cells), ABT-737 induced protective autophagy via the sequential triggering of reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, short-term activation of JNK, enhanced phosphorylation of Bcl-2, and dissociation of Beclin 1 from the Bcl-2/Beclin 1 complex. Moreover, autophagy suppressed the overactivation of the ROS-JNK pathway and protected against apoptosis. In HCC cells with low levels of Bcl-2 (i.e., Huh7 cells), ABT-737 induced apoptosis via the sequential stimulation of ROS, sustained activation of JNK, enhanced translocation of Bax from the cytosol to the mitochondria, and release of cytochrome c. In sum, this study indicated that the activation of the ROS-JNK-autophagy pathway may be an important mechanism by which HCC cells with high levels of BcI-2 are resistant to ABT-737. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available