4.7 Article

CFTR is the primary known apical glutathione transporter involved in cigarette smoke-induced adaptive responses in the lung

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 1201-1206

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.01.001

Keywords

ABC transporters; Lung disease; Oxidative stress; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Free radicals

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL075523, R01 HL084469-03, R01 HL075523-04, R01 HL084469, R01 HL084469-04, R01 HL084469-02, R01 HL084469-01A2] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK027651] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES017582-03, R01 ES017582, R01 ES017582-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most abundant antioxidants in the lung is glutathione (GSH), a low-molecular-weight thiol, which functions to attenuate both oxidative stress and inflammation. GSH is concentrated in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of the lung and can be elevated in response to the increased oxidant burden from cigarette smoke (CS). However, the transporter(s) responsible for the increase in ELF GSH with cigarette smoke is not known. Three candidate apical GSH transporters in the lung are CFTR, BCRP, and MRP2, but their potential roles in ELF GSH transport in response to CS have not been investigated. In vitro, the inhibition of CFTR, BCRP, or MRP2 resulted in decreased GSH efflux in response to cigarette smoke extract. In vivo, mice deficient in CFTR. BCRP, or MRP2 were exposed to either air or acute CS. CFTR-deficient mice had reduced basal and CS-induced GSH in the ELF, whereas BCRP or MRP2 deficiency had no effect on ELF GSH basal or CS-exposed levels. Furthermore, BCRP or MRP2 deficiency had little effect on lung tissue GSH. These data indicate that CFTR is predominantly involved in maintaining basal ELF GSH and increasing ELF GSH in response to CS. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available