4.7 Article

Major determinants of photoinduced cell death: Subcellular localization versus photosensitization efficiency

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 824-833

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.023

Keywords

Photosensitization; Intracellular localization; Methylene blue; Crystal violet; Photodynamic therapy; Singlet oxygen; ROS; Free radicals

Funding

  1. FAPESP
  2. CNPq
  3. American Cancer Society [RSG-02-026-01-CDD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study on whether and to what extent subcellular localization may compete favorably with photosensitization efficiency with respect to the overall efficiency of photoinduced cell death. We have compared the efficiency with which two cationic photosensitizers, namely methylene blue (MB) and crystal violet (CV), induce the photoinduced death of human cervical adenocarcinoma (HeLa) cells. Whereas MB is well known to generate singlet oxygen and related triplet excited species with high quantum yields in a variety of biological and chemical environments (i.e., acting as a typical type II photosensitizer), the highly mitochondria-specific CV produces triplet species and singlet oxygen with low yields, acting mostly via the classical type I mechanism (e.g., via free radicals). The findings described here indicate that the presumably more phototoxic type II photosensitizer (MB) does not lead to higher degrees of cell death compared to the type I (CV) photosensitizer. In fact, CV kills cells with the same efficiency as MB, generating at least 10 times fewer photoinduced reactive species. Therefore, subcellular localization is indeed more important than photochemical reactivity in terms of overall cell killing, with mitochondrial localization representing a highly desirable property for the development of more specific/efficient photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available