4.7 Review

Urinary 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine as a biomarker in type 2 diabetes

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 1473-1479

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.07.007

Keywords

DNA oxidation; 8-OxodG; Type 2 diabetes; Biomarker; Free radicals

Funding

  1. Research Committee at Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet (Rigshospitalets Forskningsudvalg)
  2. Danish Medical Research Council
  3. Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation
  4. P. Carl Petersen Foundation
  5. Augustinus Foundation
  6. Lundbeck Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing prevalence of diabetes together with the associated morbidity and mortality calls for additional preventive and therapeutic strategies. New biomarkers that can be used in therapy control and risk stratification as alternatives to current methods are needed and can facilitate a more individualized and sufficient treatment of diabetes. Evidence derived from both epidemiological and mechanistic studies suggests that oxidative stress has an important role in mediating the pathologies of diabetic complications. A marker of intracellular oxidative stress that potentially could be used as a valuable biomarker in diabetes is the DNA oxidation marker 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), which can be assessed noninvasively in the urine, with minimal discomfort for the patient. In this review the analytical validity of 8-oxodG is addressed by highlighting important methodological issues. The available epidemiological evidence regarding urinary 8-oxodG and type 2 diabetes is presented. A possible role for DNA oxidation in cancer development in type 2 diabetes patients is discussed, followed by an evaluation of the potential of urinary 8-oxodG as a clinical biomarker in type 2 diabetes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available