4.7 Article

A novel nitroxide is an effective brain redox imaging contrast agent and in vivo radioprotector

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 780-790

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.019

Keywords

Radioprotection; Redox imaging; Blood-brain-barrier-permeable contrast agents; Nitroxides; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. NIAID
  2. Center of Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals are exposed to ionizing radiation during medical procedures and nuclear disasters, and this exposure can be carcinogenic, toxic, and sometimes fatal. Drugs that protect individuals from the adverse effects of radiation may therefore be valuable countermeasures against the health risks of exposure. In the current study, the LD50/30 (the dose resulting in 50% of exposed mice surviving 30 days after exposure) was determined in control C3H mice and mice treated with the nitroxide radioprotectors Tempol, 3-CP, 16c, 22c, and 23c. The pharmacokinetics of 22c and 23c were measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the brain, blood, submandibular salivary gland, liver, muscle, tongue, and myocardium. It was found that 23c was the most effective radioprotector of the five studied: 23c increased the LD50/30 in mice from 7.9 +/- 0.15 Gy (treated with saline) to 11.47 +/- 0.13 Gy (an increase of 45%). Additionally, MRI-based pharmacokinetic studies revealed that 23c is an effective redox imaging agent in the mouse brain, and that 23c may allow functional imaging of the myocardium. The data in this report suggest that 23c is currently the most potent known nitroxide radioprotector, and that it may also be useful as a contrast agent for functional imaging. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available