4.7 Article

Loss of Nrf2 markedly exacerbates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 357-371

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.11.007

Keywords

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Methionine- and choline-deficient diet; Nrf2; NF-kappa B; Glutathione; Free radicals

Funding

  1. Cancer Research-UK [C4909/A7161]
  2. Association for International Cancer Research [07-0074]
  3. Tenovus Scotland [T07/39]
  4. Wellcome Trust [068692]
  5. Egyptian government
  6. Research Councils UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) arises from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as a consequence of oxidative stress. Herein we report that the development of NASH is greatly accelerated in mice lacking transcription factor Nrf2 when they are challenged with a methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet. After 14 days of feeding on an MCD diet, livers from Nrf2(-/-) mice showed a substantial increase in macro- and microvesicular steatosis and a massive increase in the number of neutrophil polymorphs, compared to livers from wild-type mice treated similarly. Livers of Nrf2(-/-) mice on the MCD diet suffered More oxidative stress than their wild-type counterparts as assessed by a significant depletion of reduced glutathione that was coupled with increases in oxidized glutathione and malondialdehyde. Furthermore, livers from Nrf2(-/-) mice on the MCD diet suffered heightened inflammation as judged by an similar to 10-fold increase in the amount of nuclear NF-kappa B p65 protein and similar to 5-fold increases in the levels of mRNA for interleukin-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor alpha, cyclooxygenase 2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase compared with livers from similarly treated wild-type mice. Thus, impairment of Nrf2 activity may represent a major risk factor for the evolution of NAFLD to NASH. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available