4.7 Article

Oxidative-stress-induced alterations in Sp factors mediate transcriptional regulation of the NR1 subunit in hippocampus during hypoxia

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 178-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.03.027

Keywords

Hypoxia; Neurodegeneration; Protein oxidation; Proteasome; Transcription; Hsp90; N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; Free radicals

Funding

  1. Defence Research and Development Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ascent to high altitude is associated with tissue hypoxia resulting from the decrease in partial pressure of atmospheric oxygen. The hippocampus, in particular, is highly vulnerable to hypoxic insult, which at least in part can be attributed to the occurrence of glutamate excitotoxicity. Although this excitotoxic damage is often related to increased NMDA receptor activation and subsequent calcium-mediated free radical generation, the mechanisms involving the transcriptional regulation of NMDA receptor subunit expression by hypoxic stress remains to be explored. Our study reveals a novel mechanism for the regulation of expression of the NR1 subunit of NMDA receptors by the Sp family of transcription factors through an oxidative-stress-mediated mechanism that also involves the molecular chaperone Hsp90. The findings not only show the occurrence of lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in hippocampal cells exposed to hypoxia but also reveal a calcium-independent mechanism of selective oxidation and degradation of Sp3 by the 20 S proteasome. This along with increased DNA binding activity of Sp1 leads to NR1 upregulation in the hippocampus during hypoxic stress. The study therefore provides evidence for free radical-mediated regulation of gene expression in hypoxia and the scope of the use of antioxidants in preventing excitotoxic neuronal damage during hypoxia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available