4.7 Article

Identifying peroxidases and their oxidants in the early pathology of cystic fibrosis

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 1354-1360

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.07.010

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis; Neutrophils; Myeloperoxidase; Peroxidase; Hypochlorous acid; Oxidative stress; Free radicals

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand
  2. Australian Cystic Fibrosis Research Trust
  3. Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences
  4. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to determine whether myeloperoxidase (MPO) is the main peroxidase present in the airways of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and to assess which oxidants it produces and whether they are associated with clinical features of CF. Children with CF (n = 54) and without CF (n = 16) underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for assessment of pulmonary infection and inflammation. BAL fluid was analyzed for MPO, halogenated tyrosines as markers of hypohalous acids, thiocyanate, and protein carbonyls. MPO was the only peroxidase detected in BAL samples from children with CF and its concentration was markedly higher than in controls. Levels of 3-chlorotyrosine and 3-bromotyrosine in proteins were higher in the CF group. They correlated with neutrophils and MPO. The concentration of thiocyanate in BAL samples was below 1 mu M. Protein carbonyl levels correlated with MPO and halogenated tyrosines in patients with CF. Levels of MPO and halogenated tyrosines were higher in children with infections, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and in the presence of respiratory symptoms. They also correlated with the Kanga clinical score. Our findings suggest that MPO produces hypobromous acid as well as hypochlorous acid in the airways of children with CF and that these oxidants are involved in the early pathogenesis of CF. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available