4.7 Article

Comparison of glutathione peroxidase 1 and peroxiredoxin 6 in protection against oxidative stress in the mouse lung

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 1172-1181

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.07.002

Keywords

Lipid peroxidation; Protein carbonyls; Phospholipid hydroperoxide; tert-Butylhydroperoxide; Hyperoxia; Paraquat; Endothelial cells; Perfused lung; Oxidative stress superarray; Free radicals

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL79063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peroxiredoxin 6 (Prdx6) and cytosolic GSH peroxidase (GPx1), both GSH-dependent peroxidases, were compared for the effects of their knockout on injury and lipid peroxidation in: (a) lungs of mice exposed to 0.85 or 1.0 atm O-2, (b) isolated perfused mouse lungs exposed to 5 mM tert-butylhydroperoxide (t-BOOH) or 1 mM paraquat, and (c) primary mouse pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells exposed to 50 mu M t-BOOH. Derangements in GPx1 null were similar or slightly greater than in wild type for all parameters in the various models of oxidant stress, whereas Prdx6 null showed markedly increased effects. GSH peroxidase activity with phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide as substrate in GPx1-null lung homogenate was decreased only slightly vs wild type, whereas activity in Prdx6-null lungs was decreased by similar to 95%, indicating that Prdx6 is the major enzyme for reduction of oxidized lung phospholipids. Expression levels of oxidant-related genes measured with a PCR-based gene array indicated no significant differences between the Prdx6 and the GPx1 null except for the target genes and IL-19. Thus, Prdx6-null mice are significantly more sensitive to oxidant stress compared to GPx1 null, suggesting that scavenging of phospholipid hydroperoxides by Prdx6 plays a major role in lung antioxidant defense. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available