4.7 Article

Variation in gene expression profiles of human monocytic U937 cells exposed to various fluxes of nitric oxide

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 298-305

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.054

Keywords

Nitric oxide; Gene expression; MAP kinases; KLF2; DDIT4; Free radicals

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. Universite Paris-Sud
  3. Institut Curie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined early and late alterations in gene expression patterns and phosphorylation levels of key regulators of selected signaling pathways in U937 cells exposed to various (NO)-N-center dot fluxes. cDNA microarray analysis and real-time quantitative PCR identified 45 NO-sensitive genes (>= 2-fold change), among which KLF2. KLF6, TSC22D3, DDIT4, MKP-5 (up-regulated), KIF23, histone H4, ARL6IP2, CLNS1A, SLC7A6, CDKN3, SRP19, and BCL11A (down-regulated) have not been reported before. For two selected genes, KLF2 and DDIT4, the sensitivity to (NO)-N-center dot was also proven at the protein level. Among the examined genes, only KLF2 had a higher sensitivity to slow release of NO (DETA-NO) than to high-dose, short-duration exposure (DITA-NO), reaching an about 50-fold increase in mRNA level. Our study revealed that fast and slow NO donors activate similar signaling pathways and induce phosphorylation of MAP kinases and downstream transcription factors ATF2 and c-Jun. Inhibitory analysis of major signaling pathways showed that activity of p38 MAPK and tyrosine kinases is indispensable for gene induction in cells exposed to DPTA-NO, whereas G-protein Rho suppression caused superinduction of KLF2 in (NO)-N-center dot-stimulated cells. Finally, we showed that both (NO)-N-center dot donors caused a marked decrease in phosphorylation of p70S6K, an mTOR substrate and regulator of mRNA translation, and protein kinase Akt, an upstream positive regulator of mTOR. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available