4.7 Article

NADPH oxidases are responsible for the failure of nitric oxide to inhibit migration of smooth muscle cells exposed to high glucose

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1578-1583

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.08.026

Keywords

Nitric oxide; High glucose; Migration; NADPH oxidase; Reactive oxygen species; Free radicals

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 HL031607, R01 AG27080, P01 HL68758]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB815/TP1]
  3. Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary System
  4. Schauffler-Stiftung
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL068758, R01HL031607] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG027080] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our previous studies showed that nitric oxide (NO) fails to inhibit migration of smooth muscle cells (SMC) exposed to high glucose (HG) because of oxidation of the most reactive cysteine, cysteine-674, on the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum ATPase, preventing its S-glutathiolation, thus blocking NO action. This study further addresses the sources of the oxidants responsible for the failure of NO to inhibit SMC migration in HG. NADPH oxidases are the major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in SMC. We used small interfering RNA or dominant-negative adenoviral vectors to target components of NADPH oxidase to study their individual roles by measuring serum-induced migration in the presence or absence of No. In HG, the mRNA levels of Nox1 and Nox4 and the protein level of Nox4 were increased; knocking down Nox1 or Nox4 attenuated the ROS production and restored the inhibition of SMC migration by NO. Blockade of the activation of Rac1 or P47(phox) inhibited serum-induced migration and restored the inhibition of migration by NO. These data indicate that NADPH oxidases are responsible for the failure of NO to inhibit SMC migration caused by HG. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available