4.7 Article

Genetic deficiency of NADPH oxidase does not diminish, but rather enhances, LPS-induced acute inflammatory responses in vivo

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 791-798

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.12.003

Keywords

NADPH oxidase; Inflammation; Reactive oxygen species; Free radicals; Redox-sensitive cell signaling; Toll-like receptor 4

Funding

  1. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) [P01 AT002034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress are thought to play a central role in the etiology of cell dysfunction and tissue damage in sepsis. However, there is limited and controversial evidence from in vivo studies that ROS mediate cell signaling processes that elicit acute inflammatory responses during sepsis. Because NADPH oxidase is one of the main cellular sources of ROS, we investigated the role of this enzyme in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute inflammation in vivo, utilizing mice deficient in the gp91(phox) or p47(phox) subunits of NADPH oxidase. Age-and body weight-matched C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and gp91(phol-/-) and p47(phox-/-) mice were injected ip with 50 mu g LPS or saline vehicle and sacrificed at various time points up to 24 h. We found that LPS-induced acute inflammatory responses in serum and tissues were not significantly diminished in gp91(phox-/-) and p47(phox-/-) mice compared to WT mice. Rather, genetic deficiency of NADPH oxidase was associated with enhanced gene expression of inflammatory mediators and increased neutrophil recruitment to lung and heart. Furthermore, no protection from LPS-induced septic death was observed in either knockout strain. Our findings Suggest that NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS production and cellular redox signaling do not promote, but instead limit, LPS-induced acute inflammatory responses in vivo. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available