4.7 Review

NF-kappa B-mediated adaptive resistance to ionizing radiation

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.09.022

Keywords

ionizing radiation; NF-kappa B; signal transduction; adaptive radiation resistance; free radicals

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA101990-03, R01 CA101990-01A1, R01 CA101990, R01 CA101990-02, R01 CA101990-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-FG02-05ER63634] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA101990] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ionizing radiation (IR) began to be a powerful medical modality soon after Wilhelm Rontgen's discovery of X-rays in 1895. Today, more than 50% of cancer patients receive radiotherapy at some time during the course of their disease. Recent technical developments have significantly increased the precision of dose delivery to the target tumor, making radiotherapy more efficient in cancer treatment. However, tumor cells have been shown to acquire a radioresistance that has been linked to increased recurrence and failure in many patients. The exact mechanisms by which tumor cells develop an adaptive resistance to therapeutic fractional irradiation are unknown, although low-dose IR has been well defined for radioadaptive protection of normal cells. This review will address the radioadaptive response, emphasizing recent studies of molecular-level reactions. A prosurvival signaling network initiated by the transcription factor NF-kappa 13, DNA-damage sensor ATM, oncoprotein HER-2, cell cyclin elements (cyclin B1), and mitochondrial functions in radioadaptive resistance is discussed. Further elucidation of the key elements in this prosurvival network may generate novel targets for resensitizing the radioresistant tumor cells. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available