4.7 Article

Selenium deficiency activates mouse liver Nrf2-ARE but vitamin E deficiency does not

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 1617-1623

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.01.016

Keywords

selenium deficiency; vitamin e deficiency; mouse liver; oxidative stress; Nrf2 ARE pathway; cytosolic oxidant defense network; phase II enzymes; free radicals

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R37 ES002497-29, P30 ES00267, R37 ES002497, R37 ES02497, R37 ES002497-28, P30 ES000267, P30 ES000267-429009] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selenium (Se) and vitamin E are antioxidant micronutrients. Se functions through selenoproteins and vitamin E reacts with oxidizing molecules in membranes. The relationship of these micronutrients with the Nrf2-antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway was investigated using ARE-reporter mice and Nrf2(-/-) mice. Weanling males were fed Se-deficient (0 Se), vitamin E-deficient (0 E), or control diet for 16 or 22 weeks. The ARE reporter was elevated 450-fold in 0 Se liver but was not elevated in 0 E liver. Antioxidant enzymes induced by Nrf2-ARE (glutathione S-transferase (GST), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase (NQOR), and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)) were elevated in 0 Se livers but not in 0 E livers. Deletion of Nrf2 had varying effects on the inductions, with GST induction being abolished by it but induction of NQOR and HO-1 still occurring. Thus, Se deficiency, but not vitamin E deficiency, induces a number of enzymes that protect against oxidative stress and modify xenobiotic metabolism through Nrf2-ARE and other stress-response pathways. We conclude that Se deficiency causes cytosolic oxidative stress but that vitamin E deficiency does not. This suggests that the oxidant defense mechanisms in which these antioxidant nutrients function are independent of one another. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available