4.7 Article

AT(1)-receptor blockade by telmisartan upregulates GTP-cyclohydrolase I and protects eNOS in diabetic rats

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 619-626

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.05.009

Keywords

AT1-receptor blocker; telmisartan; streptozotocin; diabetes; oxidative stress; endothelial dysfunction; GTP-cyclohydrolase I

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several enzymatic sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were described as potential reasons of eNoS uncoupling in diabetes mellitus. In the present study, we investigated the effects of AT(1)-receptor blockade with chronic telmisartan (25 mg/kg/day, 6.5 weeks) therapy on expression of the BH4-synthesizing enzyme GTP-cyclohydrolase I (GCH-1), eNOS uncoupling, and endothelial dysfunction in streptozotocin (STZ, 60 mg/kg iv, 7 weeks)-induced diabetes mellitus (type 1). Telmisartan therapy did not modify blood glucose and body weight. Aortas from diabetic animals had vascular dysfunction as revealed by isometric tension studies (acetylcholine and nitroglycerin potency). Vascular and cardiac ROS produced by NADPH oxidase. mitochondria, eNOS, and xanthine oxidase were increased in the diabetic group as was the expression of NADPH oxidase subunits at the protein level. The expression of GCH-1 and the phosphorylation of eNOS at Ser1177 was decreased by STZ treatment. Therapy with telmisartan normalized these parameters. The present study demonstrates for the first time that AT(1)-receptor blockade by telmisartan prevents downregulation of the BH4 synthase GCH-I and thereby eNOS uncoupling in experimental diabetes. In addition, telmisartan inhibits activation of superoxide sources like NADPH oxidase, mitochondria, and xanthine oxidase. These effects may explain the beneficial effects of telmisartan on endothelial dysfunction in diabetes. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available