4.5 Article

Estimating willingness to pay for watershed restoration in Flagstaff, Arizona using dichotomous-choice contingent valuation

Journal

FORESTRY
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 327-333

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpt035

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ecological Restoration Institute
  2. Northern Arizona University Faculty Grants Program
  3. W.A. Franke College of Business
  4. City of Flagstaff Utilities
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1038842] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forest restoration reduces the probability of catastrophic wildfire and post-fire flooding; it therefore protects the quantity and quality of water in a restored watershed. The Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) is a landscape scale restoration initiative in Northern Arizona. 4FRI plans to restore the majority of the forested watersheds that provide the municipal water supply for the City of Flagstaff, Arizona (population 65 000). While start-up funding is available for 4FRI, funding sources for future monitoring and maintenance remain uncertain. One way to promote financial sustainability for the restoration initiative is to establish a payments system wherein Flagstaff residents pay for a portion of the costs. I present results from a contingent valuation survey estimating Flagstaff residents' willingness to pay for restoration of the Lake Mary and Upper Rio de Flag watersheds. I find the average household is willing to pay similar to$4.89 per month to contribute to forest restoration, resulting in potential annual monetary net benefits of up to $1.3M. Thus, the results provide statistically significant evidence in favour for establishing a payments system. This survey focused solely on residents of Flagstaff, Arizona; however, the results are applicable in areas with similar ecosystems where forest restoration provides improved watershed services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available