4.5 Review

Creating forests with words A review of forest-related discourse studies

Journal

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 12-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.12.005

Keywords

Forest; Discourse analysis; Policy analysis; Methods

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a new trend in international forest policy science. Over the past decade the term discourse has entered the field. Discourse analytical approaches and methods have become increasingly popular among scholars dealing with forests and their governance. When consulting the growing literature, one quickly notes the inconsistent use of the terms discourse and discourse analysis. On this basis, this paper will provide (1) an overview of discourse approaches in international social and political science literature on forests, (2) identify existing trends and gaps in the literature, and (3) critically assess deficits and opportunities of existing discursive perspectives on forests and their governance. The article is based on a comprehensive survey of sixty-six journal articles, book chapters, books and online publications referring to the terms forest and discourse in the title or key words. The results suggest that forest-related discourse research may benefit from a stronger emphasis on the politics of discourse. In particular, questions of where and by whom discourses are circulated and institutionalised could provide valuable insights into forest governance. In order to arrive at these insights, however, more theoretical and methodological rigour and innovation seem to be required. Consequently, this review suggests that forest-related discourse research would benefit from (1) relating new work to the most recent discourse research conducted in different disciplines and specialisations, (2) boldly testing different available discourse lenses from political science as well as other disciplines, and (3) getting creative in adjusting those lenses (theoretically and methodologically). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available