4.7 Article

Mapping fire risk in the Model Forest of Urbion (Spain) based on airborne LiDAR measurements

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages 149-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.056

Keywords

Airborne LiDAR; Forest inventory; Fire risk assessment; Mediterranean model forest

Categories

Funding

  1. Ramon y Cajal program of the Spanish Ministry for Economy
  2. Ministry for Economy
  3. private enterprises Agresta S. Coop. and Stereo-carto S.L.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study sets a methodological framework to combine LiDAR derived data with fire behaviour models in order to assess fire risk at landscape level for forest management and planning. Two forest areas of the Model Forest in Urbion, Soria (Central Spain) were analyzed, covering 992.7 ha and 221.7 ha. The modelling phase was based in 160 field sample plots as ground data, and the LiDAR data had a density of first returns of 2 pulses/m(2), which were used to construct 13 models for stand variables (e.g. basal area, stem volume, branch biomass). The coefficients of determination ranged from 0.167 for shrub cover, to 0.906 for dominant height. The modelled variables were used for a classification of fuel types compatible with the continuous data. The simulation phase was performed using the spatialized data on FlamMap in order to assess the potential fire behaviour resulting across the whole landscape for four scenarios of moisture and wind conditions. The results showed maps of fire intensity and probability of fire occurrence, based on the simulation of 500 random ignition points, which allowed the analysis of the spatial relation between the initial state and allocation of forest resources and their risk of fire. The methodology proposed, as well as the results of this research are directly applicable for operational forest planning at landscape level. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available