4.7 Article

Factors causing variation in fine root biomass in forest ecosystems

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 261, Issue 2, Pages 265-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.016

Keywords

Basal area; Biome; Environmental variables; Rooting depth; Root diameter class; Understorey vegetation

Categories

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports and Technology [20658038]
  2. Academy of Finland [124731]
  3. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [L-08557]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [124731, 124731] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20658038] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fine roots form one of the most significant components contributing to carbon cycling in forest ecosystems. We study here the effect of variation in root diameter classes, sampling depth and the inclusion of understorey vegetation root biomass in fine root biomass (FRB) estimates. The FRB estimates for different forest biomes are updated using a database of 512 forest stands compiled from the literature. We also investigate the relationships between environmental or forest stand variables and fine root biomass (<= 2 mm in diameter) at the stand (g m(-2)) and tree level (g tree(-1)). The FRB estimates extrapolated for the whole rooting depth were 526 +/- 321 gm(-2), 775 +/- 474g m(-2) and 776 +/- 518 g m(-2) for boreal, temperate and tropical forests, respectively, and were 26-67% higher than those based on the original sampling depths used. We found significant positive correlations between <= 1 and <= 2 mm diameter roots and between <= 2 and <5 mm roots. The FRB estimates, standardized to the <= 2 mm diameter class, were 34-60% higher and 25-29% smaller than those standardized to the <= 1 mm and <= 5 mm diameter classes, respectively. The FRB of the understorey vegetation accounted for 31% of the total FRB in boreal forests and 20% in temperate forests. The results indicate that environmental factors (latitude, mean annual precipitation, elevation, temperature) or forest stand factors (life form, age, basal area, density) can not explain a significant amount of the variation in the total FRB and a maximum of 30% that in the FRB of trees at the stand level, whereas the mean basal area of the forest stand can explain 49% of the total FRB and 79% of the FRB of trees at the tree level. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available