4.7 Article

An approach to GIS-based multiple criteria decision analysis that integrates exploration and evaluation phases: Case study in a forest-dominated landscape

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 260, Issue 12, Pages 2102-2114

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.052

Keywords

Conservation; Integrated land management (ILM); Forestry; Geovisualization; Multi-criteria; Spatial decision-support system (SDSS)

Categories

Funding

  1. Memorial University of Newfoundland
  2. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service (NRCan-CFS)
  3. Sir Wilfred Grenfell College
  4. Institute for Biodiversity, Ecosystem Science and Sustainability
  5. MITACS/Accelerate
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing importance and complexity of land and natural resource management are creating a need for ecosystem-based management (EBM). Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) combined with geographic information systems (GIS) can integrate factors related to the triple bottom line of ecological, economic, and social perspectives required by EBM. However, GIS-based MCDA is limited in this role because (i) it rarely integrates or encourages an exploration phase in preparation for structured evaluation and (ii) inexperienced users may find MCDA methods and GIS software difficult to use. This paper presents a novel approach for (i) supporting an exploration phase to help structure a problem and (ii) integrating the exploration and evaluation phases in an easy-to-use software system. The approach was validated through a land-management case study in a forest-dominated landscape with a variety of stakeholders. Case-study participants used the approach to rate areas within a timber harvest plan based on their potential for conflict with conservation values. The case-study decision analysis determined that between 1.3% and 6.6% of the harvest plan area had a conservation rating of 0.30 or higher on a scale of 0-1. The system was made available to the forest industry and other stakeholders to support harvest plan adjustments, demonstrating how such tools can be used to improve and integrate our knowledge of forest ecology and management. Assessment of participant feedback reveals that an exploration phase is effective in helping understand a problem and prepare for multiple criteria evaluation (MCE). Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available