4.7 Article

Effects of winter selective tree harvest on soil microclimate and surface CO2 flux of a northern hardwood forest

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 259, Issue 3, Pages 257-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.004

Keywords

Soil surface CO2 flux; Selective tree harvest; Northern hardwood forest; Harvesting; Microclimate

Categories

Funding

  1. McIntire-Stennis [W101075]
  2. National Research Initiative of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service [2006-55101-17060]
  3. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry
  4. Bureau of Integrated Science Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil surface CO2 flux (S-flux) is the second largest terrestrial ecosystem carbon flux, and may be affected by forest harvest. The effects of clearcutting on S-flux have been studied, but little is known about the effect of alternative harvesting methods such as selective tree harvest on S-flux. We measured S-flux before and after (i) the creation of forest canopy gaps (simulating group tree selection harvests) and (ii) mechanized winter harvest but no tree removal (simulating ground disturbance associated with logging). The experiment was carried out in a sugar maple dominated forest in the Flambeau River State Forest, Wisconsin. Pre-treatment measurements of soil moisture, temperature and S-flux were measured throughout the growing season of 2006. In January-February 2007, a harvester created the canopy gaps (200-380 m(2)). The mechanization treatment consisted of the harvester traveling through the plots for a similar amount of time as the gap plots, but no trees were cut. Soil moisture and temperature and S-flux were measured throughout the growing season for 1 year prior to harvest and for 2 years after harvest. Soil moisture and temperature were significantly greater in the gap than mechanized and control treatments. Instantaneous S-flux was positively correlated to soil moisture and soil temperature at 2 and 10 cm, but temperature at 10 cm was the single best predictor. Annual S-flux was not significantly different among treatments prior to winter 2007 harvest, and was not significantly different among treatments after harvest. Annual (+1 std. err.) S-flux averaged 967 + 72, 1011 + 72, and 1012+72 g C m(-2) year(-1) in the control, mechanized and gap treatments, respectively, for the 2-year post-treatment period. The results from this study suggest selective group tree harvest significantly increases soil moisture and temperature but does not significantly influence S-flux. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available