4.7 Article

For services rendered? Modeling hydrology and livelihoods in Andean payments for environmental services schemes

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 258, Issue 9, Pages 1871-1880

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.032

Keywords

Watershed protection; Natural resource management; Payments for environmental services; Andes

Categories

Funding

  1. Andean Watersheds Project (CONDESAN-GTZ)
  2. CGIAR Challenge Program
  3. CIFOR
  4. MacArthur Foundation
  5. EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Andes, demand for water is growing and upland land-use changes are increasing. Water quality, quantity and seasonal flow have thus also become environmental services with potential monetary value. Yet, currently the region's pioneer PES schemes are not paying for measured environmental services, but for proxy land uses thought to provide the(se) service(s). Hydrological modeling makes explicit the tacit causal relationships and tests underlying assumptions Ideally, when combined with an economic analysis of land-use alternatives, this could inform decision makers on how much to pay for different interventions in different spatial locations. This paper focuses on two Andean watersheds. Moyobamba (Peru) and Pimampiro (Ecuador). In the first case, a municipal water company is preparing a payment for environmental services (PES) scheme to reduce upstream sediment loads. In the second, a similar conservation-oriented municipal PES scheme has operated since 2000, but the hydrological linkages have never been tested. Applying the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), we identify in both watersheds biophysically critical areas for service delivery, and compare services for current land uses with change scenarios deforestation, reforestation, live barriers. and agroforestry We then use the ECOSAUT optimization model to predict net economic benefits for service providers. In Moyobamba, switching to shade-grown coffee would halve sediment yields, and increase significantly farmers' economic benefits. This requires high up-front investment, but the willingness to pay of water users in Moyobamba town may suffice to cover the upfront costs. In Pimampiro, resumed deforestation would increase sediments by >50% and reduce dry-season flow by 0.5%, thus reinforcing the rationale of the existing PIES scheme, focused on conserving native forests and grasslands. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available