4.7 Article

Looking deeper: An investigation of soil carbon losses following harvesting from a managed northeastern red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) forest chronosequence

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 257, Issue 2, Pages 413-420

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.015

Keywords

Soil carbon; Stable isotopes; Chronosequence; Clearcut; Forest management

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Atlantic Innovation Fund (AIF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forest harvesting in eastern North America has been occurring for centuries but its effect on soil carbon storage and dynamics below 20 cm is not well known. This paper investigates age-related variations in carbon storage and dynamics in the organic layer and 6 depth strata in the top 50 cm of the mineral soil during ecologically important stages of post-harvest succession in a first rotation red spruce forest chronosequence that includes one of the largest old growth reference stands in northeastern North America. Storage of carbon reached a minimum 32 years post-harvest, at which time stores were approximately 50% of the intact forest. However, storage approached the range of the intact forest approximately 100 years post-harvest. Examination of age-related variations with depth revealed that concentrations of carbon below 20 cm may be driving the temporal trends in whole soil storage in these forests. Corresponding carbon isotope data were consistent with increased isotopic fractionation attributable to increased rates of mineralization post-harvest. Based on these results, we suggest that a greater emphasis should be placed upon examining storage of carbon below 20 cm in the mineral soil when evaluating the sequestration potential of intensive forest management, specifically rotation length. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available