4.7 Article

Red-tree vole habitat suitability modeling: Implications for conservation and management

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 258, Issue 5, Pages 626-634

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.041

Keywords

Arborimus; Douglas-fir forest; Northwest Forest Plan; Predictive habitat model; Red-tree vole; Reserve

Categories

Funding

  1. Survey and Manage Program of the Pacific Northwest Regional Office of the US Forest Service and the Oregon State office of the Bureau of Land Management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Pacific Northwest, USA, red-tree voles (Arborimus longicaudus) are of conservation and management interest owing to their apparent association with late-seral forests and the relatively small extent of such forests, largely a function of timber harvest, fire, and conversion of forests to non-forest uses during the past century. We created and evaluated a series of red-tree vole habitat association models, and applied the best model to evaluate tree vole habitat quality within and outside of reserves throughout most of their range in Oregon and northern California. We modeled presence and absence of tree vole nests across a gradient of biotic, abiotic, and spatial features; and within and outside of reserves. The best model included spatial coordinates, percent slope, basal area of trees with diameter at breast height (dbh) between 45 and 90 cm, maximum tree dbh, and standard deviation of conifer dbh. Plots with tree vole nests contained many late-seral/old-growth forest attributes such as large diameter, older, and variably sized trees. Evaluation of the best model, including rigorous cross-validation, showed the model to be statistically robust and to have very good/excellent predictive ability. Reserves had significantly higher mean habitat quality than non-reserved lands, and reserves had much more high quality habitat than non-reserves. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available