4.7 Article

Fine root production and turnover in Brazilian Eucalyptus plantations under contrasting nitrogen fertilization regimes

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 256, Issue 3, Pages 396-404

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.034

Keywords

eucalypts; N; fertilizer; roots; biomass; necromass; ingrowth cores; sequential soil coring; Brazil

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen fertilization increased largely over the last decade in tropical eucalypt plantations but the behaviour of belowground tree components has received little attention. Sequential soil coring and ingrowth core methods were used in a randomized block experiment, from 18 to 32 months after planting Eucalyptus grandis, in Brazil, in order to estimate annual fine root production and turnover under contrasting N fertilization regimes (120 kg N ha(-1) vs. 0 kg N ha(-1)). The response of growth in tree height and basal area to N fertilizer application decreased with stand age and was no longer significant at 36 months of age. The ingrowth core method provided only qualitative information about the seasonal course of fine root production and turnover. Mean fine root biomasses (diameter <2 mm) in the 0-30 cm layer measured by monthly coring amounted to 0.91 and 0.84 t ha(-1) in the 0 N and the 120 N treatments, respectively. Fine root production was significantly higher in the 0 N treatment (1.66 t ha(-1) year(-1)) than in the 120 N treatment (1.12 t ha(-1) year(-1)), probably as a result of the greater tree growth in the control treatment throughout the sampling period. Fine root turnover was 1.8 and 1.3 year(-1) in the 0 N and the 120 N treatments, respectively. However, large fine root biomass (diameter < 1 mm) was found down to a depth of 3 m one year after planting: 1.67 and 1.61 t ha(-1) in the 0 N and the 120 N treatments, respectively. Fine root turnover might not be insubstantial in deep soil layers where large changes in soil water content were observed. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available