4.2 Article

Detecting alcohol abuse: traditional blood alcohol markers compared to ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) measurement in hair

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 471-477

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12024-013-9416-8

Keywords

Alcohol consumption diagnosis; Hair analysis; Biomarkers; Chronic excessive alcohol intake; Cut-off values; Carbohydrate-deficient-transferrin (CDT); Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT); Aspartate amino transferase (AST); Alanine amino transferase (ALT); Mean corpuscular volume of the erythrocytes (MCV)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alcohol abuse is a common problem in society; however, the technical capabilities of evaluating individual alcohol consumption using objective biomarkers are rather limited at present. In recent years research has focused on alcohol markers using hair analysis but data on performance and reliable cut-off values are still lacking. In this study 169 candidates were tested to compare traditional biomarkers, such as carbohydrate-deficient-transferrin (CDT), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate amino transferase, alanine amino transferase and the mean corpuscular volume of the erythrocytes, with alcohol markers detectable in hair such as ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs). This study revealed that EtG, GGT and CDT showed the best results, demonstrating areas under the curve calculated from receiver operating characteristics of 0.941, 0.943 and 0.899 respectively. The lowest false-negative and false-positive rates were obtained by using a combined interpretation system for hair EtG and FAEEs. All markers demonstrated only low to moderate correlations. Optimum cut-off values for differentiation between social and chronic excessive drinking calculated for hair EtG and FAEEs were 28 pg/mg and 0.675 ng/mg, respectively. The critical values published in the Consensus on Alcohol Markers 2012 by the Society of Hair Testing were confirmed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available