4.3 Article

Association of Morbus Ledderhose With Dupuytren's Contracture

Journal

FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 841-845

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1071100713475352

Keywords

Ledderhose disease; Dupuytren's disease; epidemiology; plantar fibromatosis; plantar fascia

Categories

Funding

  1. Icelandic Centre for Research
  2. Science Fund of Family Physicians in Iceland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Fibromatous nodules in the sole of the foot are often called Ledderhose disease. It is a benign nodular formation in the plantar aponeurosis, typically at the distal medial border. A lump forms and it can be a few centimeters in diameter. It is frequently seen as an isolated disease, but a relationship to Dupuytren's has been noted in some patients. Methods: The study was a part of a large cohort study, the Reykjavik study. Men with Dupuytren's disease (n = 122) were invited to follow-up 18 years after the initial observation. An equal number of controls, matched for age and smoking habits, were also invited. A total of 92 Dupuytren's patients and 101 control subjects attended for follow-up and were examined for plantar nodules. Statistical evaluation was carried out using chi-square test and presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Ledderhose disease was identified in 14 of the 92 (15.2%) men with Dupuytren's disease, while it was only in 4 of the 101 (3.9%) matched controls (OR = 4.35, 95% CI, 1.3-16.7, P < 0.01). Men operated for Dupuytren's disease or with finger contractures were more likely to have plantar nodules than those with only nodules or strings in the palms (OR = 6.1, 95% CI, 1.8-27.1, P < 0.001). The plantar involvement was related to family history of Dupuytren's disease (OR = 3.1, 95% CI, 1.1-8.5, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Men with manifestations of finger contractures or who need surgery for Dupuytren's disease are more likely to also develop plantar fibromas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available