4.2 Article

In vitro Antioxidant Activities of Sodium Zinc and Sodium Iron Chlorophyllins from Pine Needles

Journal

FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 505-510

Publisher

FACULTY FOOD TECHNOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.17113/ftb.52.04.14.3592

Keywords

sodium zinc chlorophyllin; sodium iron chlorophyllin; sodium copper chlorophyllin; antioxidant activity; pine needles

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorophyll was extracted from pine needles, and then sodium zinc chlorophyllin (SZC) and sodium iron chlorophyllin (SIC) were synthesised by saponification, purification and substitution reaction, using sodium copper chlorophyllin (SCC) as a control. Their crystalline structures were verified by atomic absorbance spectroscopy, UV-VIS spectroscopy and HPLC. Moreover, their antioxidant activities were evaluated and compared with that of ascorbic acid through four biochemical assays: DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity, reducing power, inhibition of beta-carotene bleaching and O-2-scavenging activity. SZC had better antioxidant properties at a lower dosage than SIC and SCC in all assays. In the beta-carotene bleaching assay, EC50 of SZC, SIC and SCC was 0.04, 0.38 and 0.90 mg/mL, respectively, much lower than that of ascorbic acid (4.0 mg/mL). SZC showed a better result (p<0.05) than ascorbic acid in the O-2-scavenging activity assay. The results obtained from reducing power determination were also excellent: the absorbance values were all about 1.0 at 0.5 mg/mL, about half of that of ascorbic acid. In the investigation of DPPH radical scavenging activity, all chlorophyllins had lower activities than ascorbic acid. These results demonstrated the potential bioactivities of chlorophyll derivatives and supported their possible role in human health protection and disease prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available