4.2 Article

Correlation of average hydrophobicity, water/air interface surface rheological properties and foaming properties of proteins

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 187-193

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1082013211415137

Keywords

Soy proteins; milk whey proteins; interfacial rheology; foams

Funding

  1. Plan de Desarrollo Tecnologico (PDT) del Ministerio de Educacion y Cultura [Proyecto S/C/O/34/02, S/C/O/66/12, Beca S/C/BE/33/03]
  2. Plan de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Basicas (PEDECIBA), Uruguay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study on the behavior in the air-water interface of beta-lactoglobulin, alpha-lactoalbumin, glycinin and beta-conglycinin was performed. The behavior at the interface was evaluated by equilibrium surface tension and surface rheological properties of adsorbed films. There were significant differences (alpha <= 0.05) in the values of the constants of adsorption to the interface of the four proteins. The glycinin had the slowest rate of adsorption, due to its low average hydrophobicity, low molecular flexibility and large molecular size. Smaller proteins like beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-lactoalbumin tended to greater equilibrium pressure values than the larger proteins because of its higher rate of adsorption to the interface. The foam capacity of proteins showed a positive correlation with the average hydrophobicity; the maximal retained liquid volume or the initial rate of passage of liquid to foam were significantly lower (alpha <= 0.05) when protein was glycinin. The dilatational modulus of glycinin was the lowest, which implies lowest resistance to disruption of the film. Glycinin protein has lower proportion of gravitational drainage and higher disproportionation having perhaps a less resistant film. In conclusion, beta-conglycinin and whey proteins showed a similar behavior, so beta-conglycinin might be the best soybean protein to replace milk proteins in food formulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available