4.4 Article

Populations and potential association of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with lactic acid bacteria in naturally fermented Korean rice wine

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 419-424

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KOSFOST
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-012-0053-x

Keywords

Korean rice wine; yeast; lactic acid bacteria; associated growth; nuruk; differential count

Funding

  1. IPET [109149-03-2-SB010]
  2. Institute of Planning & Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (iPET), Republic of Korea [IPET109149-3] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microbial populations focused on predominant yeast species and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in 15 commercial makgeolli brands, where a fungal starter nuruk was used were examined. Viable yeast counts were obtained on yeast potato dextrose (YPD) and MRS agar containing sodium azide. MRS-C (0.1% cycloheximide supplemented) was used for selective counts of LAB. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was found to be predominant in the 15 samples tested, with an average count of 4.6x10(7) CFU/mL. Contrary to the earlier studies, Lactobacillus plantarum and Weissella cibaria were shown as predominant LAB species with an average count of 1.7x10(7) CFU/mL. Surprisingly, as many as 7 log viable cells/mL were present at the ethyl alcohol concentration of 6-7%. The data from real-time PCR also indicated that the yeast populations remains almost constant during the refrigerated storage of 12 days, while that of LAB decrease slightly first 9 days and increase after then, despite the overall increase in acidity. Data from the differential microbial counts suggest that yeast S. cerevisiae might be associated with 2 LAB species, L. plantarum and W. cibaria, under ethyl alcohol stress during the turbid rice wine fermentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available