4.4 Article

Physicochemical Properties of Thawed Chicken Breast as Affected by Microwave Power Levels

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 971-977

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KOSFOST
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-011-0134-2

Keywords

microwave thawing; microwave power level; chicken breast; white muscle

Funding

  1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
  2. Korean Government [608001-05-2-SB310]
  3. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development
  4. Institute of Planning & Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (iPET), Republic of Korea [IPET608001-5] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main objective of this study was to determine the effect of microwave thawing at different power levels on the physicochemical properties of chicken breast. Each frozen chicken breast samples were thawed in microwave oven at microwave power levels of 125, 250, and 375W. To compare the effect of microwave thawing on meat quality, refrigerator thawing was used as a control. As the microwave power level increased, the thawing rate increased and temperature differences between the edge position and center position of the samples also increased. Treatment at a power level of 250 W resulted in a lower thawing loss and a higher moisture content, water holding capacity, and tenderness than the other treatments (p<0.05). However, there were no significantly differences of proximate composition excluding moisture content, pH, lightness, and yellowness. The use of excessive input energy during microwave thawing (higher microwave power level) damaged the physicochemical properties of the thawed chicken breast; therefore, the microwave power level of 250 W is the best thawing method on the frozen chicken breast to minimize the changes in meat quality in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available