4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Carotenoid and antioxidant content of ground paprika from indoor-cultivated traditional varieties and new hybrids of spice red peppers

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 231-237

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.04.048

Keywords

Paprika; Carotenoids; Vitamin E; Vitamin C; Chromatography; Drying

Funding

  1. TAMOP [4.2.1. B-11/2/KMR2011-0003]
  2. Szent Istvan University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences [9910-3/2013/TUDPOL, KTIA-AIK-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The content of carotenoids and the main antioxidant vitamins in traditional varieties and new hybrids of spice red pepper (Ccapsicum annuum L.) cultivated under plastic houseindoor conditions was studied. The varieties and hybrids were evaluated on the basis of results obtained from liquid chromatographic determination of carotenoid and antioxidant vitamins, and compared for their response to different drying conditions. Ground paprika from all varieties and hybrids cultivated under plastic houseindoot conditions were remarkably rich in colorants (average: 8629 mu g/g d) and vitamin E (average: 1189 mu g/g), but vitamin C level was found to be higher (average: 83 mg/g DWdm) in paprika from arable-landoutdoor cultivated peppers dried naturally. The paprika from the Spanish hybrids 'Jeromin', 'Jaranda', 1970/05 and the varieties Hungarian 'Remeny' and 'SZ-80' varieties as well as the hybrid '1970/05' contained the highest level of carotenoids and antioxidants (P < 0.05). The different varieties and hybrids differed in their response, in terms of stability, to drying conditions. Natural drying was favourable for the highest carotenoid retention, but not for the retention of vitamin C. It was surprising that drying at 50 degrees C for 24 h resulted in a paprika with vitamin C content 1.5-3 times higher than that found in paprikas produced with other drying methods. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available