4.7 Article

Identifying motives underlying wine purchase decisions: Results from an exploratory free listing task with Burgundy wine consumers

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 860-867

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.04.052

Keywords

Wine; Free listing task; Consumer research; Purchase decision

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development
  2. EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) Labex Europe
  3. CNPq (Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development)/Labex
  4. Sea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To better understand consumer decision making processes while purchasing wine it is important to identify which attributes consumers actually rely on and how they perceive and weight them in order to reach a final decision. The aims of the present work were to identify motives underlying wine purchase decisions and to identify consumer segments with different drivers of wine purchase. One hundred and twenty seven Burgundy wine consumers were asked to complete a free listing task. Relevance of each category of elicited terms was estimated by Smith's and Cognitive saliency indices. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on individual Smith's saliency indices. In the free listing task, respondents listed an average of 5.6 terms, the minimum number per participant being 2 and the maximum 11. The four categories with the highest saliency indices were Price, Production region, Wine type and Production year. Two consumer segments with different motives underlying their wine purchase decisions were identified. Cluster 1, mainly composed of young consumers, elicited Price, Production region, Food and wine pairing and Consumption context as the most salient motives, while Cluster 2, composed of older consumers, mentioned Production region, Price, Grape variety and Wine type as the most salient ones. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available