4.7 Article

Inhibiting enzymatic starch digestion by the phenolic compound diboside A: A mechanistic and in silico study

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 595-600

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.062

Keywords

Diboside A; Starch; alpha-Amylase; Sucrase; Uncompetitive inhibitor; Molecular docking

Funding

  1. Jing Brand Co. Ltd. [R-143-000-455-597]
  2. Hubei Natural Science Foundation [2011CDA020]
  3. National University of Singapore under the Singapore International Graduate Award (SINGA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retarding the starch digestion rate is the key to produce low glycemic index (GI) foods for diabetic patients in prevention of postprandial hyperglycemia. In the search for naturally-occurring starch hydrolase inhibitors as active ingredients for low Cl foods, we applied a high throughput assay to screen hundreds of edible botanical materials and discovered that a phenylpropanoid sucrose ester, diboside A (1,3,6'-tri-p-coumaroyl-6-feruloyl sucrose), isolated from the root of wild buckwheat exhibited potent alpha-amylase inhibitory activity with an IC50 of 26.9 mu M. Kinetic study revealed that it is an uncompetitive inhibitor of alpha-amylase with a K-i of 5.1 mu M. Moreover, diboside A inhibits rat intestinal sucrase as a noncompetitive inhibitor with a K-i of 72.4 mu M. Remarkably, it has no measurable activity towards maltase. An in silico molecular docking study shows that there are two possible allosteric binding sites between diboside A and enzyme-substrate complex. Binding site one is a more probable binding site because of lower energy of the ternary complex formed by hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. Our results suggest that phenylpropanoid sucrose esters have potential as an active ingredient for low GI foods. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available