4.7 Article

Exopolysaccharide-producing Bifidobacterium strains elicit different in vitro responses upon interaction with human cells

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 99-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.11.020

Keywords

Probiotic food; Exopolysaccharide; Bifidobacteria; Intestinal cellular line; PBMC; Cytokine

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. Spanish Plan Nacional I + D + I from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [AGL2006-03336]
  3. CSIC [PIE-2006701169]
  4. MICINN [AGL2007-61805]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probiotic foods intended for human nutrition are gaining economic relevance but it is clear that for the application of new strains scientific and rational selection criteria must be used. In this work, the role of exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by Bifidobacterium strains in their potential beneficial effect was studied. Two in vitro biological models were used to test the interaction of seventeen strains and their polymers with the host. In general, the EPS-producing bifidobacteria showed good adherence properties to Caco2 and HT29 cell lines which could be of interest for a transitory colonisation of the gut. Most purified EPS were able to slightly stimulate the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and their cytokine production pattern, depending on the polymer type tested. In general, neutral high molar mass EPS diminished the immune response, whereas acidic and smaller polymers were able to elicit an increased response. Thus, EPS synthesised in situ during dairy fermentations could be involved in some of the beneficial effects attributed to the EPS-producing bacteria. Probiotic functionality of these strains seems to be related to the physico-chemical characteristics of EPS as is known to occur with the technological properties. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available