4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Fast screening method for assessment of antimicrobial activity of essential oils in vapor phase

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 161-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.044

Keywords

Antibacterial; Antifungal; Fumigant; Fumigation; Vapour; Microatmosphere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among promising alternative methods to control food spoilage much attention is being paid to the use of essential oils (EOs), and lately also to their activity in vapor phase. Until now, no standard assay exists, and there are many methods used by different authors, but any of them is suitably adapted for fast screening of large quantities of samples. We have modified most commonly used disc volatilization method by using four-section Petri dish (PD. 90 mm diameter), large filter paper disc (85 mm diameter) evenly impregnated with EO and medium containing lid. In comparison to normal disc volatilization method, labor and material needed are several times reduced, while the composition of headspace is more uniform than in case of 6 mm disc, where different volatility of particular compounds could influence the results. Sixty nine EOs were tested for its antimicrobial activity against three bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enteritidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and three fungi (Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium digitatum). Thirty nine EOs inhibited at least one microorganism, Armoracia rusticana and Cinnamomum zeylanicum being the most active, followed by EOs of Eugenia caryophyllata, Origanum compactum, Origanum vulgare, Pimento racemosa, Thymus serpyllum and Thymus vulgaris inhibiting all six or five microorganisms, respectively. According to our opinion, this method is suitable for screening of large quantities of samples for antimicrobial activity in vapor phase. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available