4.7 Article

Effects on Escherichia coli inactivation and quality attributes in apple juice treated by combinations of pulsed light and thermosonication

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 299-305

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.08.020

Keywords

Non-thermal preservation; Pulsed light; Thermosonication; Apple juice; E. colt; Beverage quality

Funding

  1. Non-Commissioned Food Institutional Research Measure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulsed light (PL) and Thermosonication (TS) were applied alone or in combination using a continuous system to study their effect on Escherichia coli inactivation in apple juice. Selected quality attributes (pH, degrees Brix, colour (L, a, b, Delta E), non-enzymatic browning (NEBI) and antioxidant activity (TEAC)) were also evaluated pre- and post-processing. Two PL (360 mu s, 3 Hz) treatments were selected and the juice exposed to energy dosages of 4.03 J/cm(2) ('low' (L)) and 5.1 J/cm(2) ('high' (H)) corresponding to 51.5 and 65.4 J/mL, respectively. The juice was also processed by TS (24 kHz, 100 mu m) at 40 degrees C for 2.9 min (L) or 50 degrees C for 5 min (H), corresponding to 1456 and 2531 J/ml energy inputs, respectively. The effect of the resulting four energy levels and sequence (PL + TS and TS + PL) was studied. When the technologies were applied individually the maximum reduction achieved was 2.7 and 4.9 log CFU/mL (for TS (H) and PL (H) respectively), while most of the combined treatments achieved reductions in the vicinity of 6 log CFU/mL, showing an additive effect for both technologies when acting in combination, regardless of the sequence applied. All treatments significantly changed the colour of apple juice and the sequence in which the technologies were applied affected colour significantly (P<0.05). The energy level applied did not affect any of the measured quality attributes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available